This is the best information available I have found, so far.
- Introduction
- Information on salaries across countries
- Average gross salaries
- Salaries adjusted to the cost of living
- Salaries compared to GDP per capita
- Salary progression by experience and gender
- References
Introduction
The following sections present comparative data on salaries. After some general obervations about the relation between salaries and the organisation of university systems in different countries, we provide figures for different countries in absolute terms, adjusted to the cost of living and compared to GDP per capita. We also show salary progression by experience and gender.These sections are constantly being updated with new information, given the wide interest in salary issues. As with all the ACO web pages, we invite you to send us comments and useful information and links on salaries in academia. To comment contact us by email.
Information on salaries across countries
Comparing salaries across countries requires some preliminary observations. Salary levels vary both across and within countries. Depending on national legislation and university governance, salary levels can be either fixed rigidly by the state or decided by universities.In 2007, Bruegel calculated 'setting autonomy' by ten European countries and assigned values between 0 and 1. Many countries (Belgium, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Spain and Switzerland) had no autonomy (0). Sweden was the country with the highest autonomy (1), and The Netherlands (0.2), Denmark (0.5) and the UK (0.8) are located in between. The total for the ten European was 0.3 (Bruegel, 2007: 5).
Another issue is salary dispersion. There may be significant variations of salary at entry-level positions in universities in systems where universities are more or less free to set their own wages. Even within the same system salaries may vary according to seniority and/or merit. In systems where salaries progress mainly with seniority this progression is visible and can be measured. This is not true in those countries where salaries are fixed according to merit (e.g. record of publications).
In liberalised systems where universities are free to set their own wages, salary growth can be influenced not only by the dynamics of internal competition in the academic market, but also by external competition by non-academic agents, including private economic actors.
Overall, we can say that salaries are higher in systems where either 1) universities are autonomous, compete in the academic market and use salaries to attract and build a strong faculty, or 2) the state fixes high salaries. The UK and the US are typical examples of the first model. Switzerland is a good example of the second model. Universities from these three countries also dominate in the Shangai system for ranking universities.
Average gross salaries
The table below provides a comparison of avarage gross salaries across countires. Titles of academic positions differ form country to country but for means of comparison we have unified them into five categories. In countries where the position or its equivalent does not exist, the space is left blank. For more information on salaries as well as the start and maximum salary level, follow the link to the individual country pages.Note that Ph.D. Candidate is included as a position, even though it is mostly in the Scadinavian countries that Ph.D. Candidates are considered employees with contractual rights equivalent to other academic positions.
Average Gross Salaries, €/month |
|||||
PhD |
Postdoc |
Junior Lecturer/
Assistant Professor |
Senior Lecturer/
Associate Professor |
Full Professor |
|
Belgium (2007) |
--
|
--
|
4.318
|
5.138
|
6.625
|
Canada (2007) |
--
|
--
|
4.856
|
6.096
|
7.145
|
Denmark (2007) |
3.152
|
4.560
|
--
|
5.499
|
6.974
|
Finland (2007) |
2.290
|
3.220
|
--
|
3.420
|
5.218
|
France (2007) |
--
|
2.500
|
--
|
3.000
|
4.500
|
Germany (2007) |
--
|
--
|
3.277
|
3.744
|
4.546
|
Ireland (2004) |
--
|
--
|
5.250
|
6.400/7.700*
|
9.750
|
Israel (2007) |
--
|
--
|
2.650
|
3.029/3.597*
|
4.733
|
Italy (2004) |
--
|
1.500
|
2.500
|
4.000
|
5.500
|
Netherlands (2004) |
--
|
--
|
3.974
|
5.541
|
6.544
|
Norway (2005) |
3.203
|
3.950
|
--
|
4.330
|
5.297
|
Poland (2006/2007) |
--
|
--
|
586
|
1.127
|
1.758
|
Russia (2007) |
250
|
--
|
--
|
600**
|
900/1.100***
|
Spain (2003) |
--
|
1.584
|
2.250
|
2.750
|
3.584
|
Sweden (2006) |
2.365
|
3.317
|
3.142
|
3.800
|
5.145
|
UK (2007) |
--
|
3.813
|
4.766
|
5.842
|
6.353
|
Ukraine (2006) |
50
|
100
|
200
|
400
|
1.000
|
USA (2006) |
--
|
3.708
|
4.820
|
5.785
|
8.529
|
* These figures refer to respectively 'senior lecturer' and 'associate professor' positions.
** This figure refers to the undifferentiated 'lecturer' position.
** These figures refer to respectively the 'professor' and 'chair' positions.
** This figure refers to the undifferentiated 'lecturer' position.
** These figures refer to respectively the 'professor' and 'chair' positions.
All figures are gross. For taxing comparisons see: http://www.oecd.org. All countries provide different social benefits, social security, child care, family allowance, etc, to their citizens.
The salaries are provided by institutions or ministries in the respective countries.
For more detailed information salary levels see the individual country links.
Note that in the different countries there are various ways to top the salary with bonuses and other means of income. This is especially true in the case of Spain and the U.S. where the salaries comparatively seem very low, but the actual salary can be much higher depending on the productivity and outside activities of the individual.
The salaries are provided by institutions or ministries in the respective countries.
For more detailed information salary levels see the individual country links.
Note that in the different countries there are various ways to top the salary with bonuses and other means of income. This is especially true in the case of Spain and the U.S. where the salaries comparatively seem very low, but the actual salary can be much higher depending on the productivity and outside activities of the individual.
In April 2007 the European Commission published a comparison of researchers salaries across Europe, based on an online survey. The following chart gives the average salaries adjusted to the cost of living in each country:
Average weighted total yearly salary per countries (2006 in €)
Country | Average weighted total yearly salary adjusted | Country | Average weighted total yearly salary adjusted |
Austria | 62.406 | Latvia | 10.488 |
Belgium | 58.462 | Lithuania | 13.851 |
Bulgaria | 3.556 | Luxembourg | 63.865 |
Croatia | 16.671 | Malta | 28.078 |
Cyprus | 45.039 | Netherlands | 59.103 |
Czech Republic | 19.620 | Norway | 58.997 |
Denmark | 61.355 | Poland | 11.659 |
Estonia | 11.748 | Portugal | 29.001 |
Finland | 44.635 | Romania | 6.286 |
France | 50.879 | Slovakia | 9.178 |
Germany | 56.132 | Slovenia | 27.756 |
Greece | 25.685 | Spain | 34.908 |
Hungary | 15.812 | Sweden | 56.053 |
Iceland | 50.803 | Switzerland | 82.725 |
Ireland | 60.727 | Turkey | 16.249 |
Israel | 42.552 | United Kingdom | 56.048 |
Italy | 36.201 |
Source: European Commission, 2007: 43.
The report found bropad differences between salaries in the EU and associated countries, which however were reduced once salaries were adjusted to the cost of living in each country. As expected, countries with a high cost of living were those that paid researchers better. Low-medium salary levels were reported in Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean region, while high-very high salaries were paid in Central Europe and the Nordic countries.
A few countries (Austria, The Netherlands, Israel, Switzerland and Luxembourg) offered avarage salaries in line with the U.S. considering the cost of living.
Other countries outside the EU (Australia, India, Japan) all have average higher remuneration than the EU-25 area considering the cost of living. In Australia and Japan salaries are similar to those of the U.S. The only country in which the average salary was well below the EU was China.
See the report for further info
The report found bropad differences between salaries in the EU and associated countries, which however were reduced once salaries were adjusted to the cost of living in each country. As expected, countries with a high cost of living were those that paid researchers better. Low-medium salary levels were reported in Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean region, while high-very high salaries were paid in Central Europe and the Nordic countries.
A few countries (Austria, The Netherlands, Israel, Switzerland and Luxembourg) offered avarage salaries in line with the U.S. considering the cost of living.
Other countries outside the EU (Australia, India, Japan) all have average higher remuneration than the EU-25 area considering the cost of living. In Australia and Japan salaries are similar to those of the U.S. The only country in which the average salary was well below the EU was China.
See the report for further info
Salaries compared to GDP per capita
The ratio between the average salary for researchers and the average GDP per capita (adjusted to the cost of living) varies from country to country. Data show different degrees of investment on research by different countries. For example, with declining values Japan, the UK and the US all provide researchers with salaries higher than their country GDP per capita. Spain and Sweden pay around the same as the average GDP, and Italy pays less.Click here to see the graph
Salary progression by experience and gender
The table draws on the Commission's study and reports researchers' annual salary average in the EU and associated countries by gender and years of experience.The table draws on the Commission's study and reports researchers' annual salary average in the EU and associated countries by gender and years of experience.
Country/years of experience (by gender) |
0-4 y. Female Male |
5-7 y. Female Male |
8-10 y. Female Male |
11-15 y. Female Male |
>15 y. Female Male |
Austria | 34.473 37.244 |
41.921 50.446 |
49.369 63.648 |
56.817 76.850 |
64.266 90.052 |
Belgium | 27.767 26.802 |
35.079 40.933 |
42.392 55.064 |
49.705 69.195 |
57.018 83.326 |
Bulgaria | 2.045 1.961 |
2.668 2.689 |
3.292 3.417 |
3.915 4.144 |
4.539 4.872 |
Croatia | 9.862 9.458 |
12.665 12.124 |
15.468 15.541 |
18.270 19.922 |
21.073 25.537 |
Cyprus | 22.234 21.208 |
28.051 32.147 |
33.867 43.086 |
39.684 54.025 |
45.500 64.964 |
Czech Republic |
7.478 10.728 |
10.792 15.015 |
14.105 19.301 |
17.419 23.587 |
20.733 27.874 |
Denmark | 43.117 42.852 |
51.460 52.204 |
59.804 61.556 |
68.147 70.908 |
76.490 80.260 |
Estonia | 4.825 7.691 |
6.939 10.068 |
7.636 12.444 |
8.334 14.821 |
9.053 17.198 |
Finland | 23.369 28.886 |
29.776 36.724 |
36.182 44.563 |
42.589 52.401 |
48.996 60.239 |
France | 30.223 30.726 |
38.859 39.225 |
47.494 50.075 |
56.129 63.926 |
64.765 81.608 |
Germany | 22.143 25.716 |
35.969 38.731 |
49.795 51.746 |
63.621 64.761 |
77.447 77.776 |
Greece | 13.462 11.823 |
19.131 18.370 |
24.800 24.917 |
30.469 31.464 |
36.138 38.011 |
Hungary | 6.902 10.706 |
10.152 13.244 |
13.401 15.783 |
16.650 18.322 |
19.899 20.861 |
Iceland | 45.664 44.713 |
50.070 50.073 |
52.273 55.432 |
54.475 60.792 |
58.881 66.152 |
Ireland | 26.428 20.290 |
39.691 41.073 |
52.954 61.856 |
66.217 82.639 |
79.480 103.422 |
Israel | 16.329 13.523 |
22.407 20.453 |
28.486 30.933 |
34.564 46.783 |
40.643 70.754 |
Italy | 12.244 12.760 |
19.777 23.488 |
27.310 34.216 |
34.844 44.944 |
42.377 55.672 |
Latvia | 12.000 - |
14.667 - |
17.335 - |
20.002 - |
22.670 - |
Lithuania | 7.356 6.836 |
8.286 9.068 |
9.216 11.299 |
10.146 13.531 |
11.076 15.763 |
Luxembourg | 24.742 43.578 |
40.365 53.864 |
55.988 64.150 |
71.611 74.436 |
87.234 84.722 |
Malta | 24.364 21.364 |
27.267 23.746 |
30.169 26.393 |
33.071 29.336 |
35.974 32.606 |
Netherlands | 22.518 31.921 |
35.655 47.095 |
48.792 62.269 |
61.929 77.443 |
75.066 92.617 |
Norway | 49.031 52.829 |
54.174 58.346 |
59.316 63.864 |
64.459 69.381 |
69.602 74.898 |
Poland | 5.921 8.453 |
8.088 10.166 |
10.255 12.226 |
12.421 14.703 |
14.588 17.682 |
Portugal | 10.512 12.051 |
14.693 17.541 |
20.535 25.532 |
28.702 37.164 |
40.115 54.095 |
Romania | 3.813 2.476 |
4.696 4.474 |
5.785 6.473 |
7.126 8.472 |
8.778 10.471 |
Slovakia | 5.547 5.895 |
6.794 7.187 |
8.041 8.762 |
9.287 10.681 |
10.534 13.021 |
Slovenia | 16.424 17.976 |
22.502 22.372 |
28.581 27.844 |
34.659 34.654 |
40.737 43.130 |
Spain | 16.416 17.228 |
22.858 22.955 |
29.300 30.586 |
35.742 40.754 |
42.184 54.301 |
Sweden | 28.591 28.012 |
41.900 42.655 |
55.209 57.298 |
68.518 71.941 |
81.827 86.584 |
Sweden | 28.591 28.012 |
41.900 42.655 |
55.209 57.298 |
68.518 71.941 |
81.827 86.584 |
Switzerland | 39.599 40.862 |
55.711 61.075 |
71.823 81.288 |
87.935 101.501 |
104.047 121.714 |
Turkey | 7.674 8.634 |
10.707 11.387 |
13.740 15.016 |
16.773 19.803 |
19.806 26.116 |
United Kingdom |
25.411 29.060 |
37.461 38.608 |
49.511 51.293 |
61.561 68.146 |
73.611 90.536 |
Source: European Commission, 2007: 47
Here too the report found wide differences between countries. For example, in the UK one can expect a high progression moving from the first (0-4) to the last (>15) stage of the career stages considered by the report. At the same time, Denmark offers higher salaries already in the first stage but progression is limited (around 90%) compared to the UK (around 235%).
Women earn less than men, with significant differences in all the countries. In some (Estonia, Czech Republic, Israel and Portugal) the gap is above 35%. In others (Bulgaria, Greece, Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Malta) it is below 15%.
See the report for more info.
European Commission (2007), Study on the Remuneration of Researchers in the Public and Private Commercial Sectors (pdf).
Each year, The American Economic Association sends out to selected institutions the Universal Academic Questionnaire (UAQ), an annual survey of US economics departments. The American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings includes a few tables assembled from the latest UAQ responses. Even though the accuracy of these results depends on the willingness of individual departments to collaborate, it is, nonetheless, a good indication of the working conditions to be expected in the American job market for economists.
All the figures in the tables below refer to academic-year salaries (calendar-year salaries are converted into academic-year salaries by multiplying by 0.818) and in USD. 1 USD = 0.734 Euros on 28 September 2011. The number of surveyed institutions is indicated in round parentheses; satndard deviations for salaries in square parentheses.
The Table below shows the salaries of tenured faculty at different institutions, based on the highest degree awarded in economics. Of course, universities granting research-based degrees (PhD) attract the most talented economists and offer the best salary packages.
US academic-year salaries of tenure-track academic economists
(2010-11)
US academic-year salaries of tenure-track Associate and Full Professors in PhD granting universities by NRC Tiers (2010-11)
Employment conditions for new Assistant Professors (2010-11)
Here too the report found wide differences between countries. For example, in the UK one can expect a high progression moving from the first (0-4) to the last (>15) stage of the career stages considered by the report. At the same time, Denmark offers higher salaries already in the first stage but progression is limited (around 90%) compared to the UK (around 235%).
Women earn less than men, with significant differences in all the countries. In some (Estonia, Czech Republic, Israel and Portugal) the gap is above 35%. In others (Bulgaria, Greece, Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Malta) it is below 15%.
See the report for more info.
Bibliography
Bruegel (2007), 'Why Reform Europe's Universities?', Policy Brief Series, 2007/04.European Commission (2007), Study on the Remuneration of Researchers in the Public and Private Commercial Sectors (pdf).
Salaries in Economics in US Academia 2010-11
- Introduction
- Salaries of tenure-track academic economists by degree-granting institution
- Salaries of Associate and Full Professors at PhD-granting institutions
- Employment conditions for new Assistant Professors
- References
Introduction
The American academic market for young economists is undoubtedly the most interesting and sought after. Salary packages are competitive in most universities, and not necessarily in the top-ranked ones.Each year, The American Economic Association sends out to selected institutions the Universal Academic Questionnaire (UAQ), an annual survey of US economics departments. The American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings includes a few tables assembled from the latest UAQ responses. Even though the accuracy of these results depends on the willingness of individual departments to collaborate, it is, nonetheless, a good indication of the working conditions to be expected in the American job market for economists.
All the figures in the tables below refer to academic-year salaries (calendar-year salaries are converted into academic-year salaries by multiplying by 0.818) and in USD. 1 USD = 0.734 Euros on 28 September 2011. The number of surveyed institutions is indicated in round parentheses; satndard deviations for salaries in square parentheses.
Salaries of tenure-track academic economists by degree-granting institution
The US academic market for economics is highly segmented and either focuses on teaching activities (institutions granting mainly BA and MA degrees) or on research activities as well (most institutions granting PhD degrees).The Table below shows the salaries of tenured faculty at different institutions, based on the highest degree awarded in economics. Of course, universities granting research-based degrees (PhD) attract the most talented economists and offer the best salary packages.
Full Prof | Associate Prof | Assistant Prof | |
---|---|---|---|
PhD Institutions | $159,816 (76)
[$41,772] |
$117,231 (76)
[$30,821] |
$100,451 (83)
[$13,471] |
MA Institutions | $106,953 (33)
[$14,998] |
$84,803 (31)
[$12,429] |
$79,492 (40)
[$11,743] |
BA Institutions | $103,262 (148)
[$23,987] |
$80,382 (30)
[$14,571] |
$74,677 (37)
[$15,393] |
Salaries of Associate and Full Professors at PhD-granting institutions
The National Research Council (NRC) rankings of economics graduate programs divide programs into tiers. The top three tiers include:- Tier 1 (ranked 1-6): Chicago, Harvard, MIT, Princeton, Stanford and Yale;
- Tier 2 (ranked 7-15): Columbia, Michigan, Minnesota, Northwestern, Pennsylvania, Rochester, California-Berkeley, UCLA, and Wisconsin-Madison;
- Tier 3 (ranked 16-30): Illinois-Urbana, Boston University, Brown, Cornell, Duke, Iowa, Maryland, Michigan State, New York University, North Carolina, Texas-Austin, Virginia, California-San Diego, University of Washington, and Washington University-St. Louis.
Full Prof | Associate Prof | |
---|---|---|
Tiers 1-2 (ranks 1-15) | $224,010 (6)
[$47,750] |
$151,417 (5)
[$46,188] |
Tier 3 (ranks 16-30) | $180,518 (8)
[$29,605] |
$133,932 (8)
[$34,314] |
Tier 4 (ranks 31-48) | $171,024 (9)
[$38,446] |
$131,678 (9)
[$27,492] |
Tier 5 (ranks 49+) | $140,714 (45)
[$26,216] |
$104,758 (42)
[$17,791] |
Employment conditions for new Assistant Professors
The Table below provides a fuller description of the employment conditions of newly hired Assistant Professors at US academic institutions offering different degrees in economics. In addition to the salary, compensations include: guaranteed summer compensation (over all years), other cash benefits to employees, such as a signing bonus. They do not include fringe benefits, moving expenses, computer that remains the property of the institution. Finally, the Table also summarizes the teaching load for each new Assistant Professor (courses per year), which is inversely correlated to the highest degree on offer.Salary | Add. compensation | Teaching load | |
---|---|---|---|
PhD Institutions | $111,878 (83)
[$28,422] |
$39,378 (81)
[$21,423] |
3.5 (86)
[2.4] |
MA Institutions | $83,834 (26)
[$10,659] |
$14,333 (7)
[$10,571] |
4.6 (35)
[0.7] |
BA Institutions | $73,431 (10)
[$12,660] |
$4,214 (9)
[$2,644] |
5.8 (11)
[1.4] |